Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
I strongly oppose the refusal to accept these tag edits. Many of the edits were declined by the same reviewer with similar reasons, namely that "it's not worth bumping posts for silly tags". This i...
Answer
#4: Post edited
by
Andreas witnessed the end of the world today
·
2024-02-17T13:31:40Z (9 months ago)
They're not a moderator, apparently. Nor do they have the "edit posts" ability, so I'm honestly a bit confused here.
I strongly oppose the refusal to accept these tag edits. Many of the edits were declined by the same moderator with similar reasons, namely that "it's not worth bumping posts for silly tags". This is incorrect reviewing. This is an incorrect reason for declining edits. The reason is quite simple: correctly tagging posts is crucial to this site. Tags aren't just keywords; tags are _the_ way we organize posts. If all posts had been correctly tagged in the first place, or these issues had been fixed early, we wouldn't have been in a situation where we'd have the problem of inactive posts getting bumped. Refusal to fix the tagging only postpones the problem.- The fact that posts get bumped for such minor edits, is a flaw in the system, not a flaw in the edit. Don't punish users, nor our knowledge base, for a flaw in the software.
- I strongly oppose the refusal to accept these tag edits. Many of the edits were declined by the same reviewer with similar reasons, namely that "it's not worth bumping posts for silly tags". This is incorrect reviewing. This is an incorrect reason for declining edits. The reason is quite simple: correctly tagging posts is crucial to this site. Tags aren't just keywords; tags are _the_ way we organize posts. If all posts had been correctly tagged in the first place, or these issues had been fixed early, we wouldn't have been in a situation where we'd have the problem of inactive posts getting bumped. Refusal to fix the tagging only postpones the problem.
- The fact that posts get bumped for such minor edits, is a flaw in the system, not a flaw in the edit. Don't punish users, nor our knowledge base, for a flaw in the software.
#3: Post edited
by
Andreas witnessed the end of the world today
·
2024-02-17T12:01:33Z (9 months ago)
I strongly oppose the refusal to accept these tag edits. Many of the edits were declined by the same moderator with similar reasons, namely that "it's not worth bumping posts for silly tags". This is incorrect reviewing. This is an incorrect reason for declining edits. The reason is quite simple: correctly tagging posts is crucial to this site. Tags aren't just keywords; tags are _the_ way we organize posts. If all posts had been correctly tagged in the first place, or these issues had been fixed early, we wouldn't have been in a situation where we'd have the problem of inactive posts getting bumped. Refusal to fix the tagging only postpones the problem.
- I strongly oppose the refusal to accept these tag edits. Many of the edits were declined by the same moderator with similar reasons, namely that "it's not worth bumping posts for silly tags". This is incorrect reviewing. This is an incorrect reason for declining edits. The reason is quite simple: correctly tagging posts is crucial to this site. Tags aren't just keywords; tags are _the_ way we organize posts. If all posts had been correctly tagged in the first place, or these issues had been fixed early, we wouldn't have been in a situation where we'd have the problem of inactive posts getting bumped. Refusal to fix the tagging only postpones the problem.
- The fact that posts get bumped for such minor edits, is a flaw in the system, not a flaw in the edit. Don't punish users, nor our knowledge base, for a flaw in the software.
#2: Post edited
by
Andreas witnessed the end of the world today
·
2024-02-17T11:56:01Z (9 months ago)
Specify which edits I oppose the refusal of. There are more than just tag edits on the list, and my answer does not concern the review of those.
I strongly oppose the refusal to accept these edits. Many of the edits were declined by the same moderator with similar reasons, namely that "it's not worth bumping posts for silly tags". This is incorrect reviewing. This is an incorrect reason for declining edits. The reason is quite simple: correctly tagging posts is crucial to this site. Tags aren't just keywords; tags are _the_ way we organize posts. If all posts had been correctly tagged in the first place, or these issues had been fixed early, we wouldn't have been in a situation where we'd have the problem of inactive posts getting bumped. Refusal to fix the tagging only postpones the problem.
- I strongly oppose the refusal to accept these tag edits. Many of the edits were declined by the same moderator with similar reasons, namely that "it's not worth bumping posts for silly tags". This is incorrect reviewing. This is an incorrect reason for declining edits. The reason is quite simple: correctly tagging posts is crucial to this site. Tags aren't just keywords; tags are _the_ way we organize posts. If all posts had been correctly tagged in the first place, or these issues had been fixed early, we wouldn't have been in a situation where we'd have the problem of inactive posts getting bumped. Refusal to fix the tagging only postpones the problem.
#1: Initial revision
by
Andreas witnessed the end of the world today
·
2024-02-17T11:36:03Z (9 months ago)
I strongly oppose the refusal to accept these edits. Many of the edits were declined by the same moderator with similar reasons, namely that "it's not worth bumping posts for silly tags". This is incorrect reviewing. This is an incorrect reason for declining edits. The reason is quite simple: correctly tagging posts is crucial to this site. Tags aren't just keywords; tags are _the_ way we organize posts. If all posts had been correctly tagged in the first place, or these issues had been fixed early, we wouldn't have been in a situation where we'd have the problem of inactive posts getting bumped. Refusal to fix the tagging only postpones the problem.