Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

75%
+4 −0
Q&A How to deal with links to commerce?

Please don't use/allow links like this It's fundamentally still advertising Notwithstanding what manufacturers or retailers are suggested, and regardless of apparent intent, links like these stil...

posted 5mo ago by Karl Knechtel‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Karl Knechtel‭ · 2024-06-17T06:15:11Z (5 months ago)
## Please don't use/allow links like this

### It's fundamentally still advertising

Notwithstanding what manufacturers or retailers are suggested, and regardless of apparent intent, links like these still fundamentally serve the purpose of advertising a product or service. If this answer had come from a new user, I would have flagged it as spam. Ignoring such links sets a terrible precedent by discouraging vigilance against spammers. It's worth noting here especially that undisclosed affiliate links aren't always trivial to detect.

### It's really not necessary

Considering the purpose in context, simply stating that SSD storage can be obtained relatively cheaply is more than enough. If we're going to be doing subjective comparisons, it would be more interesting in practical terms to talk about, say, the relative size of low-end storage devices vs. a typical Linux installation.

Ideas like this are perfectly well expressed by giving rough ranges and speaking in general terms. If the community really feels that evidence is necessary, it would be better to use a secondary source, e.g. a link to an editorial on a hardware review site.

### Temporal concerns

Storage is likely to continue getting cheaper. The numbers provided here will go out of date soon enough. Does it benefit anyone to keep them up to date? Are the numbers *necessary* to convey what they're intended to convey (which doesn't actually appear to be all that objective)?

More interesting, anyway, is the cost *ratio* between SSDs and HDDs, byte for byte.

### Cultural and personal concerns

"Cheap" is relative - considering both the local economy and personal preferences. Also, individual demands for storage space vary greatly. Putting numbers on the storage cost doesn't really change the fact that this is putting forward an opinion. It could be useful to put forward a *reality check*, but frame-challenging "do you need HDD storage at all?" isn't going to work well in a vacuum, especially not when the frame challenge isn't actually described as such.