Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

30%
+1 −5
Q&A There should be a full moderation log visible to everyone

Each site should have a page that shows the full history of all moderator actions (such as closes and deletes). This should be visible to everyone, even users who are not logged in. To protect the ...

2 answers  ·  posted 5mo ago by matthewsnyder‭  ·  last activity 5mo ago by Olin Lathrop‭

#1: Initial revision by user avatar matthewsnyder‭ · 2024-06-26T15:02:33Z (5 months ago)
There should be a full moderation log visible to everyone
Each site should have a page that shows the full history of all moderator actions (such as closes and deletes). This should be visible to everyone, even users who are not logged in. To protect the privacy of moderators, the names can be anonymized to something like "Moderator 1", "Moderator 2", etc. when viewed by users who do not have sufficient privileges themselves. Timestamps can be fuzzed as well, so that instead of exact time only an approximate form (eg. "3 weeks ago") is shown to low-level users.

The benefits of this are:

* Checking on moderators is crowdsourced - the entire userbase can check their work instead of just a handful
* Discussion of moderator activity can be based on fact - people can link to the specific actions they mean
* Protects users from bad moderation
* Gives users confidence that the moderation is consistent and not arbitrary
* Provides a way for users to learn *de facto* site rules and culture, in addition to the *de jure* one

I think that currently, you can see various information about moderator actions if you have enough related privileges yourself, however, the "average user" cannot see all of this. Also, I suspect that it is built towards looking at the history of a particular post, not seeing "what the moderators have been up to lately".