Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
I don't think it is necessary to define what a duplicate is for the whole network. Each community might have its own view and criteria when it comes to identifying duplicates and I think Codidact s...
Answer
#3: Post edited
I don't think it is necessary to defined what a duplicate is for the whole network. Each community might have its own view and criteria when it comes to identifying duplicates and I think Codidact should give each community this freedom.For example some communities are more focused on solving problems, for other communities explanations might be more important. This will influence what duplicates are for each community.
- I don't think it is necessary to define what a duplicate is for the whole network. Each community might have its own view and criteria when it comes to identifying duplicates and I think Codidact should give each community this freedom.
- For example, some communities are more focused on solving problems, for other communities explanations might be more important. This will influence what duplicates are for each community.
#2: Post edited
I don't think it is necessary to defined what a duplicate is for the whole network. Each community might have its own view and criteria when it comes to identifying duplicates and I think Codidact should give each community this freedom.
- I don't think it is necessary to defined what a duplicate is for the whole network. Each community might have its own view and criteria when it comes to identifying duplicates and I think Codidact should give each community this freedom.
- For example some communities are more focused on solving problems, for other communities explanations might be more important. This will influence what duplicates are for each community.