Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A Poll for chat users and non-chat users

I don't use the chat associated with Codidact for three reasons: It's a waste of time. If there is something to talk about that would be content in one of the Q&A sites, then that's where it ...

posted 2mo ago by Olin Lathrop‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Olin Lathrop‭ · 2024-10-20T15:32:42Z (2 months ago)
I don't use the chat associated with Codidact for three reasons:<ol>

<li><b>It's a waste of time.</b>  If there is something to talk about that would be content in one of the Q&A sites, then that's where it should be.  If it's related but not thought out well enough to be a proper Q&A question, then it's not ready yet to ask a bunch of volunteers to spend time on it.  If it's not even related to a Q&A topic, then it's just part of a kaffeeklatsch.  No thanks.  I've got better things to get on with.

<li><b>It's not useful to the chat comment author.</b>  Information you write isn't really added to the store of knowledge we are trying to build.  Most likely, only the single user or group you are responding to will ever see what you write.  Writing in chat has very low bang for buck ratio.

<li><b>I don't want to be associated with something called "Discord".</b>  In the early days of Codidact, there would often be references to the "Discord server".  I didn't know what it was, but the name was very off-putting.  There is enough discord in the world already.  I don't want to be part of more.  It was also off-putting that people would just say "Discord server", and expect everyone else to know what they were talking about.  It felt like the private domain of an "in" clique.  I eventually realized Discord was some kind of chat server, but the name and the experience still makes me not want to have any part in it.