Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

66%
+2 −0
Q&A Can we streamline the process for closed bad questions?

Some mitigation: Sometime in the last several months (sorry I missed updating here at the time), we added a flag type that is visible to people with the Curate ability: Change post status Th...

posted 12d ago by Monica Cellio‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Monica Cellio‭ · 2024-12-09T22:10:31Z (12 days ago)
Some mitigation:

Sometime in the last several months (sorry I missed updating here at the time), we added a flag type that is visible to people with the [Curate ability](https://meta.codidact.com/abilities/flag_curate):

![new flag: change post status](https://meta.codidact.com/uploads/bv3jl3pbow4knk20jo9q7h4gs253)

> Change post status  
> This post should be reopened/closed, locked/unlocked, or deleted/undeleted. Please elaborate in the details field below.

Using this flag type increases the pool of people who can respond if a post should be reopened (or have other state changes).  I admit that currently it is not a *large* increase -- we know abilities are too hard to earn and we need to figure that out -- but moderators can also make explicit ability grants where that's helpful, so at least there's an option to appoint more people to carry out these actions.

A long time ago we sketched out a design for *ongoing* voting on closure, so instead of having close-reopen cycles on SE, people could counter-vote to say "no, keep it open" if a post was nominated for closure.  This all depends on having a mechanism that even involves multiple people -- these are single-person actions right now -- and I think we (all, not just the team) need to think more about how we want this to really work before starting that project.