Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
Yes, this is a good idea. I have run into this. Only last week I tried to use something like the <sup> tag, and I only found out it didn't work in a comment after the comment was posted. E...
#2: Post edited
by
trichoplax
·
2025-03-27T20:32:47Z (7 days ago)
Typo
Yes, this is a good idea. I have run into this. Only last week I tried to use something like the <sup> tag, and I only found out it didn't work in a comment until the comment was posted.- Even better would be to support all the same "small" tags that main posts do. <sup> and the like really <i>should</i> be supported in comments.
- Yes, this is a good idea. I have run into this. Only last week I tried to use something like the <sup> tag, and I only found out it didn't work in a comment after the comment was posted.
- Even better would be to support all the same "small" tags that main posts do. <sup> and the like really <i>should</i> be supported in comments.
#1: Initial revision
by
Olin Lathrop
·
2025-03-27T11:42:31Z (7 days ago)
Yes, this is a good idea. I have run into this. Only last week I tried to use something like the <sup> tag, and I only found out it didn't work in a comment until the comment was posted. Even better would be to support all the same "small" tags that main posts do. <sup> and the like really <i>should</i> be supported in comments.