Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the "town hall" (meta-discussion site) for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Inconsistent formatting of footnotes between posts and comments

+2
−0

Codidact uses CommonMark for Markdown, which has an extension that supports footnotes using the following format:

Sentence with a footnote[^1] in it.

[^1]: The content of the footnote.

This renders as:

Sentence with a footnote[1] in it.

Note that the footnote is automatically rendered as a link to the footnote at the bottom of this post, and the footnote at the bottom of this post automatically ends with a link back to the position in the text that referred to it.

Such footnotes can be used in both posts and comments (see the example footnote thread below this post). However, in a post the superscript link to the footnote shows in square brackets, as [1] whereas in a comment the superscript link to the footnote shows as a lone number, as 1.

I don't have a strong preference on which format should be used, but I would expect the format to be consistent between posts and comments.

Do you have a preference on which format should be used?


  1. The content of the footnote. ↩︎

History

1 comment thread

Example footnote thread (1 comment)

Sign up to answer this question »