Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Review Suggested Edit

You can't approve or reject suggested edits because you haven't yet earned the Edit Posts ability.

Approved.
This suggested edit was approved and applied to the post about 1 month ago by trichoplax‭.

148 / 255
Chat feature for Moderators
  • I have some questions. Actually, I learned from SE that, "separate questions or, do not ask multiple question in once". That's why I am not adding multiple questions at once. But, if we can ask multiple question in one question in Codidact than, I will do that next time. ~ <b>Discussion ("status" tag doesn't depend on the question).</b>
  • <hr/>
  • I was thinking of moderators. As I am not moderator anywhere. But, I have the question cause, this may help other moderators also. Moderators could have different opinion in a question. Suppose, you had closed a question as Rude. But, another moderator had opened that question again. He is also saying that it is not rude. Moderator who closed the question did some research on the question again. He is again saying that it is rude. So, they have to discuss now. Currently there's no place where they can discuss. Some might say,"they can discuss on Discord". But, Discord or, any other social media won't be a good place for discussing on this topic. Even, some might say there's comment section. But, that should be completely private (between moderators and staffs) ~ not necessary. But, comment section won't be a good place although. So, I would request for chat feature (not like SE. This feature only can be access by mods).
  • There's another reason of saying it. In SE, few mods close question together. While in Codidact only one moderator close question.
  • <hr/>
  • Our current comment system is more useful than, Chat system according to me. I am adding some more information for the question also as I said thread is more useful. Now, what I want that is some private thread which only can access by moderators and staffs. There's another feature I want to implement that is, if any moderator or, staffs wants to add some more people (users) to a private thread system than, user with Curate privilege's can know what happened to "those things" (which problem I talked earlier). **Only when moderators give them access to that thread**.
  • I have some questions. Actually, I learned from SE, that "separate questions or, do not ask multiple questions in one", which is why I am not adding multiple questions at once. But, if we can ask multiple questions in one question on Codidact, then I will do that next time. ~ <b>Discussion ("status" tag doesn't depend on the question).</b>
  • ---
  • I was thinking of moderators. I am not a moderator anywhere, but, I have this question cause, this may help other moderators also. Moderators could have different opinion on a question. Suppose, a moderator closes a question as Rude. But, another moderator opens that question again. He is saying that it is not rude. The moderator who closed the question did some research on the question again. He is saying that it is rude indeed. So, they have to discuss now. Currently, there's no place where they can discuss.
  • > They can discuss on Discord.
  • But, Discord, or, any other social media won't be a good place for discussing on this topic.
  • > There's a comment section.
  • But, that should be completely private (between moderators and staff) ~ not necessary. But, comment section won't be a good place although.
  • So, I would request for chat feature (not like SE, this feature only can be access by mods).
  • There's another reason of saying it. On SE, a few moderators close a question together. While on Codidact only one moderator can close a question.
  • ---
  • Our current comment system is more useful than, chat system according to me. I am adding some more information for the question also as I said thread is more useful. Now, what I want that is some private thread which only can access by moderators and staff.
  • There's another feature I want to implement that is, if any moderator or staff wants to add some more people (users) to a private thread system then, user with the [Curate privilege](https://meta.codidact.com/abilities/flag_curate) can know what happened to "those things" (the problem which I talked about earlier). **(Only when moderators give them access to that thread).**

Suggested about 2 months ago by meta user‭