Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Review Suggested Edit

You can't approve or reject suggested edits because you haven't yet earned the Edit Posts ability.

Usually, I will say no. Cause, I have experienced something. If we could see who had upvoted or downvoted then, we might get some hostility. **Anyway, you was talking about only if answerer could see if questioner upvoted or downvoted.**
I will say answerer doesn't have to see if questioner upvoted or downvoted. If they had seen your post and if that worked for him than, he will upvote or ignore (I personally don't suggest to ignore (some people usually don't like to upvote or downvote that's why I said that) but, if that answer is good than, other users in the community might upvote that). And, if they didn’t find that useful they will comment and downvote. After 1 or 2 comments he/she might ignore your comment cause, they might think that the answer isn’t useful and "I" believe he can't solve my problem. Then, they will downvote or ignore.
Some people have talked about reactions earlier so, I am not talking about that.
------------------
> Should it be correct etiquette for the asker to leave a comment saying "Thanks"
~~The discussion had been done in [Software Development CD](https://software.codidact.com/posts/282677/282682#answer-282682)~~
>While "Hello" and "Thank you" are noise (overhead) for the questions and answers, they are also part of how we actually interact with each other as human beings. So, I would let them be. ~ from above linked answer
I would like to add something in Alexei's "answer". "Asker have to say thanks upvote", (similar to this), that is comletely his own wish. Asker can do what they want. We shouldn’t force them to say those things, or upvote. If you think that your answer is very helpful for that person than you can request him to upvote".
-----------------
At first, I said you might get hostility if you could see who had upvoted. Voting abuse is available. If you ask a question in Stack Overflow and, if you asked the same question in Software Codidact then, if you don’t get any upvote or downvote in Stack Overflow then, you will get at least 1 downvote in software codidact. The same thing happens to Codidact also. If you see that a single person is down-voting (serial voting) all your post then, if you can know who that is then, you will downvote his posts either or, you will bad behave with him indirectly since you have to follow Code of Conduct so, you can't bad behave directly.
---------------
~~If you ever seen any voting abuse than, flag for moderator attention ~ said Staff Cellio.~~
Currently, I am thinking to "let moderator see who had upvoted or downvoted".

Usually, I will say no. Cause, I have experienced something. If we could see who had upvoted or downvoted then, we might get some hostility. **Anyway, you was talking about only if answerer could see if questioner upvoted or downvoted.**
I will say answerer doesn't have to see if questioner upvoted or downvoted. If they had seen your post and if that worked for him than, he will upvote or ignore (I personally don't suggest to ignore (some people usually don't like to upvote or downvote that's why I said that) but, if that answer is good than, other users in the community might upvote that). And, if they didn’t find that useful they will comment and downvote. After 1 or 2 comments he/she might ignore your comment cause, they might think that the answer isn’t useful and "I" believe he can't solve my problem. Then, they will downvote or ignore.
Some people have talked about reactions earlier so, I am not talking about that.
------------------
> Should it be correct etiquette for the asker to leave a comment saying "Thanks"
The discussion had been done in [Software Development Codidact](https://software.codidact.com/posts/282677/282682#answer-282682).
> While "Hello" and "Thank you" are noise (overhead) for the questions and answers, they are also part of how we actually interact with each other as human beings. So, I would let them be. ~ from above linked answer
I would like to add something in Alexei's "answer". "Asker have to say thanks upvote", (similar to this), that is completely his own wish. Asker can do what they want. We shouldn’t force them to say those things, or upvote. If you think that your answer is very helpful for that person than you can request him to upvote".
-----------------
At first, I said you might get hostility if you could see who had upvoted. Voting abuse is available. If you ask a question in Stack Overflow and, if you asked the same question in Software Development Codidact then, if you don’t get any upvote or downvote in Stack Overflow then, you will get at least 1 downvote in Software Development Codidact. The same thing happens to Codidact also. If you see that a single person is down-voting (serial voting) all your post then, if you can know who that is then, you will downvote his posts either or, you will bad behave with him indirectly since you have to follow Code of Conduct so, you can't bad behave directly.
---------------
If you ever seen any voting abuse than, flag for moderator attention ~ said Staff [Monica Cellio](https://meta.codidact.com/users/8046).
Currently, I am thinking to "let moderator see who had upvoted or downvoted".

Communities

Review Suggested Edit