Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Review Suggested Edit

You can't approve or reject suggested edits because you haven't yet earned the Edit Posts ability.

Rejected.
This suggested edit was rejected about 3 years ago by deleted user:

Hello Istiak, I think I will remove the community proposal tag altogether.

84 / 255
Is there a Codidact community fitting for this question (or one emerging)?
  • Is there any Codidact network website in the horizon to accept this question?
  • Perhaps with some edit or conceptual change the question would be a good fit for scientific speculation?
  • > ## Daily life computerized automation as impacting the number of marriages and live births
  • >
  • > I understand that dating is quite of a new phenomenon and it was rare to nonexistent before the 19th century; marriages were typically a way to share resources between families to ensure survival and prosperity and was most often based on matchmaking rather than on anything we would name "dating" today.
  • >
  • > In modern era marriages define mutual residence and having children with the common and challenged view that men should bring all or most salary and women should bring little to no salary and either way, mainly do housekeeping tasks.
  • >
  • > Is there a theory according to which computerized automation (i.e. applications and robots), applied in daily life, somewhat decrease, or actually increase, the amount of family arrangements and live births?
  • Is there any Codidact network website in the horizon to accept this question?
  • Perhaps with some edit or conceptual change the question would be a good fit for scientific speculation?
  • > ## Daily life computerized automation as impacting the number of marriages and live births
  • >
  • > I understand that dating is quite of a new phenomenon and it was rare to nonexistent before the 19th century; marriages were typically a way to share resources between families to ensure survival and prosperity and was most often based on matchmaking rather than on anything we would name "dating" today.
  • >
  • > In modern era marriages define mutual residence and having children with the common and challenged view that men should bring all or most salary and women should bring little to no salary and either way, mainly do housekeeping tasks.
  • >
  • > Is there a theory about applications and robots (i.e. computerized automation), applied in daily life, greatly decreasing or maybe actually increasing the amount of even the most progressive family arrangements and live births?

Suggested about 3 years ago by deleted user