Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for HDE 226868
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #278340 |
I'm an astronomy PhD student (pulsars, mainly) and I'm active on Scientific Speculation as a mod and Mathematics as a regular user. I'd be interested, particularly if there's an astrophysics component to the site scope. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276508 |
@aCVn I agree - I referenced that a couple of times for posts on Stack Exchange. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276508 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: What help pages need to be written? Just to formalize something that's in the works, but which I'd like feedback on: a help center page on LaTeX would be useful. It doesn't have to be (and probably shouldn't be) deployed to all sites, because most won't need to have MathJax enabled, but it would be nice to have a basic page that sites ... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #275906 |
I'd be a big fan of this; the HNQ definitely helped me get my start on Worldbuilding on SE. Maybe the effect of it would be lessened here at the present - it's my impression that a lot of folks are involved in building communities on multiple Codidact sites - but I guess advertising specific content ... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74907 |
"Research-level Q&A" is interesting. I feel like it has the potential to dissuade people from using it because it might sound like it's only for people who actively conduct research in the area - it has an "experts only" vibe, which we probably don't want. Not sure I really have any better ideas, tho... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74929 |
@ThomasMyron I think it would be good for us to avoid anything involving the word "worldbuilding", both to 1) not dissuade anyone who's not working on building a world or writing a story, and 2) differentiate us from Worldbuilding Stack Exchange. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #74929 |
I feel like using "what-if" kinda leads to the same sort of issues with inviting broadness we had on Worldbuilding that lead to the mini meta crisis in early 2016. . . But I also don't really have a better idea. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |