Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Culyx
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #283096 |
I had not referenced your post at the time, I was considering the split of video games into a development and games communities. Though I will clarify I think you'd want something separate from the current tags. it would behave a lot like tags, but would be it's own separate thing. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283096 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Questions Displaying in more than one community? Related to the idea of splitting up various CD communities, we seem to be assuming that questions have to belong to one community. Just thinking on the idea that Questions could have another set of tags (or something) that denotes what communities they show up in. Communities remain focused t... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #282751 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Ideas on the separation of Game Development from Videogames CD I think there should a be a split, while they have a common thread tying them together (video games), mixing them up just adds extra "stuff" to filter through for the desired content. Some users might want both content, but separating out the development questions from the player questions with two c... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #282026 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
No filter for unanswered questions This is somewhat related to Need a better way of finding unanswered questions. Which does make it easier to see what has answers already in a list. However why is there no filter for unanswered? If I'm looking to answer some questions why do I have to hunt them down? At least on software there... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278097 |
I suggest we at the least separate out the site content and codidact content, I had a look and didn't realize that one of those topics wasn't just "codidact in general" at first (checked on Writing) under the Help menu we have: Answer scoring and ordering, Categories and post types, Codidact search ... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278110 |
I fully agree, but we still need to facilitate sharing those different standards across numerous sites. A patch work may feel more free to those that understand the boundaries but moderation may feel strict to people that start to check out other communities and start getting punished for activity th... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278095 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Community Rules Was reading this Post and I certainly agree with the general differences like open source and non-profit that differentiate Codidact. But the Community vs Repo point leaves some questions. Sure each Site/Community here is ultimately the masters of their own destiny, but where are new comers suppo... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #276927 |
I'm not looking for a code review site, I was wondering something like that would be relevant to handling duplicate questions; I've seen a mock up from another question that looks like we handle them very similarly to SO, but not much else deliberation on them. I'm still left to assume we have simila... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #276927 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Duplicate Questions? Are duplicate questions a concern here as well? Is the old banner of "repository of good Q&A" still a thing? Has there been any consideration to some of the old suggestions regarding duplicate question handling? i.e. having a separate bin of questions that get "graduated" to "Repo" status. Or s... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |