Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Julio Cezar Silva
Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Comment | Post #277023 |
Back when I was writing my first question on a random online forum, this was the first design decision that came to my mind. Most of the times, it's far easier to summarize something you _already wrote_. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #277270 |
@luap42 I'd argue "following" is a great-to-have feature, as it's generally useful for anyone who wants updates on any content inside Codidact. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #277270 |
The transparency in this is appreciated. I like the idea of _maybe_ repositioning the comments section depending on the viewport (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #277268 |
From these first drafts it seems to me Codidact is planning on using the lateral space for other information (stats, related questions) and the fact that comments will be threaded does reduce UI clutter in my opinion. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #277268 |
Oh, nice! Figma is perfect for structuring designs like these. I realized I didn't interpret "threaded comments" to be like this, but I'm glad that's one of the first drafted ideas, as it leaves reading depth in the users' hands. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
Edit | Post #277267 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
Question | — |
Is there a consensus on comment layouts for the MVP and beyond? I've been looking around Codidact sites, wiki, repos and mission, to be able to determine if this is even a discussable or interesting topic at all. I was about to drop any ideas to ask this question, until I found the following in the wiki's Codidact Vision (emphasis mine): > Our big ideas for th... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |