Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for curiousdannii
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #279724 |
Why even have the discussion category? What makes you think it would fare any better than any of the other sites of that sort on the internet where it's a disaster? (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279279 |
Indeed, that is what I assumed, but it's still a huge UI bug. Why is the link even there if you can't close? (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #279275 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #279275 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
No visible explanation of why too long edited comments are rejected If you try to edit an comment and submit it with more than 500 characters, the site rejects your edit (500 error) but there is no visible explanation. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279268 |
Multiple sites. 1 rep. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279066 |
No, there really is basically no overlap between linguistics and the kind of vocabulary/etymology/translation requests that SE and the new Codidact L&L site get. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #279268 | Initial revision | — | almost 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
403 error when voting to close screenshot I'm getting this error pop up when I try to close vote a question. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278884 |
@PeterCooperJr But who decides "what the Bible says"? No text is ever read uninterpreted. So either you share your personal interpretation, or you share someone else's interpretation. And we've found it very helpful to separate these approaches. They could both be allowed on one site, with each quest... (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278894 |
@Mithrandir24601 Punctuation is fine, but there should also be some alphanumeric characters too. (Including non-Latin characters. Something pronounceable IMO. Usernames should not be only emoji for example.) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278894 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278894 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278894 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Usernames of only periods and spaces shouldn't be allowed This username shouldn't be allowed: . . It's hard to even see that it is a username link most of the time, it's probably problematic for @ commenting, and it's dehumanising and anti-community as it discourages other people from putting any mental i... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278884 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: A Christianity community The SE sites have firmly divided the two areas of 1) documenting how perspectives interpret passages, from 2) personal, fresh, eclectic, or other kinds of exegesis. The two areas really have very different needs for evaluating answers, the first needs quotes or references from the relative authori... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |