Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the "town hall" (meta-discussion site) for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for __shiva_c
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #280953 |
You win me over. :P (more) |
— | over 5 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280953 |
@Lundin Yeah, those points are both valid. Maybe a tag such as "User committed to *this* answer"? (more) |
— | over 5 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280953 | Initial revision | — | over 5 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Suggestion for allowing to mark answers as "accepted", "outdated" or "dangerous" There is another aspect that I don't see discussed; accepting answers has the side-effect of helping to optimize/minimize database access. For example―pretending SE is the industry definer―a potential answerer would typically be subjected to questions that have no accepted answers yet. Besides... (more) |
— | over 5 years ago |