Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for elemtilasâ€
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #283318 |
Post edited: Added a bit. |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283335 |
Post edited: Clarification. |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283318 |
@#54232 -- Not sure how to edit the proposal's name. Maybe you have to do that? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #283318 |
Suggested edit: Added a bit. (more) |
helpful | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283362 |
Post edited: Added a bit. |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283335 |
I flagged the old proposal as a duplicate of this one. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283362 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Proposal for a Stories & Worlds Community The Other Side of the Moebium I'm copying and updating this from the other, seemingly dormant, worldbuilding related proposal from a year ago. I think this would mesh here as well. It looks to me like Speculative Science codidact forum is going to claim the scientific side of the geopoetical coin. ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283335 |
As I recall, those were there when I first responded several months ago. Thomas Myron, the one who made the proposal, hasn't responded to anything in a year, so I'm guessing he's more or less dropped it. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283335 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Proposal for a Stories & Worlds Community Is there any way this proposal can be combined with the Worldbuilding Proposal? I think JBH's proposal and my proposal for a deeper dive into issues of world (and story) building mesh pretty well. I also think that anyone who would want to join Stories & Worlds would also join WB.CD. And vice vers... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281761 |
Indeed not! Subjective is what I've been trying to gently promote over on WB.SE and I think with some success, given the fairly rigid Q&A model they use. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281761 | Initial revision | — | almost 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: How's the interest for a Worldbuilding site? The Other Side of the Moebium It looks to me like Speculative Science codidact forum is going to claim the scientific side of the geopoetical coin. This is good (though I really don't get the name -- speculative science speaks to me of what the future has in store for real world science). I'd like t... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280155 |
While I'd probably peek in at SciSpec, I suspect I'd be more interested in the content here. Will give this some thought and post a separate response. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #75053 |
I'm definitely interested, but I'd like to understand the scope of the proposal, too! (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #75053 |
How much room are you allowing for the NON-scientific, the artistic, the irrealis in this proposal? Worldbuilding is much more than laws of nature and how to keep the water from spinning off a planet. There are loads of aesthetic concerns, matters of art, matters of cultures and histories and stories... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280155 |
I am active on WB.SE, and would expect to be similarly active here. I'd like to see more detail on the proposal though. For example, what is "realistic" and what is "plausible" here in the real world may be entirely different from what are "realistic" and "plausible" in an invented world. Likewise, a... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |