Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for whybecause
Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Comment | Post #285553 |
The point of Codidact isn't wide-ranging free exchange--it's to ask technical and factual questions and get expert answers. I think we lose nothing on this particular site by "squashing" the kinds of free exchange that undermine the mission of the site. It doesn't squash it in the world, you still ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #285553 |
I'm not sure censorship is always bad. Government censorship is one thing, but Codidact isn't anyone's government. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #285446 |
I've also kind of wondered: Why not give users the ability to just download the full set of their own data? Like, processing the data into some easily read, minimal analytics sounds good. But also just give users their own raw data? I'm not sure how that data is stored on the backend and whether g... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #285293 |
@#54706 True, and even if it happens, what's the harm in capping the number of downvotes? I've heard that in general, if you can slow down interactions that people have online, and give people time to think and calm down before reacting, it can help them to behave more politely and constructively. ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
Comment | Post #285293 |
Even if a poster does have low-quality posts, I think there is probably more downside to letting people downvote too much rather than not enough. If you downvote more than ... I dunno, 5 times in a row? 10 times? More than 2 standard deviations above average? Some similar metric that is proportio... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |