Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Help page: call for improvement suggestions

Parent

Help page: call for improvement suggestions

+2
−0

At the top right of each page is a link to Help.

The help center, showing a variety of help articles

If you want a specific help article to be edited or added, please raise that on your community specific Meta so that a moderator can make those changes for you. This question is instead about changes that moderators cannot currently make.

If there is something about the help system that you would like to be improved that moderators do not currently have access to change, please mention it in an answer. I recommend making a single suggestion per answer, so that voting can show which changes there is more community demand for, so that they can be implemented in priority order.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+1
−1

Ordering within category

Topics can be ordered within a category if you edit them to add sequence numbers. In the absence of explicit sequencing, they appear to be alphabetical by title.

For the "default" (baked-in) topics, we should seed these with sequence numbers so they come out in a logical order. When we do this, leave gaps between those numbers to make it easier for communities to insert new entries. We should then apply this sequencing to every community that hasn't locally modified this already.

The benefits would be a more logical ordering for new instances and consistency across communities on our network. Nobody should have to hand-edit sequence info into every topic on every community on our network.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

Resequencing from the main page (4 comments)
Sequence numbers are bad (5 comments)
Resequencing from the main page
trichoplax‭ wrote 5 days ago

I hadn't realised moderators could change the sequence. That sounds like a good start already.

Even if we leave gaps in the initial numbering, the addition of new links with arbitrary numbers means there may need to be renumbering at some point. The problem of renumbering to make room for a new link sounds labour intensive. I'd like to see the ability for a moderator to resequence the main page directly (perhaps dragging links or pressing up and down buttons in an edit mode). Each affected link can then have its sequence number adjusted automatically in the background, without the moderator needing to go in and edit each one.

Monica Cellio‭ wrote 5 days ago

I worked on a large documentation project that didn't have an external table of contents but instead used this kind of numbering. We started things out with intervals of 10 (10, 20, 30...) instead of just 1, 2,3..., and that left us room to insert things (and then insert things between the inserted things). I agree it's a hack and external control would be better; I hated that aspect of that tool as opposed to a real TOC file.

trichoplax‭ wrote 5 days ago

I relate. I learned to program in BASIC, back when the line numbers were part of the code. They would default to 10, 20, 30 so at first adding lines in between was fine, but eventually I'd be trying to guess where to leave space (should I make this new line 25, or 23 because I'm more likely to add further lines after it than before it?).

I'd like to find a way of avoiding that pain for Codidact moderators, but in a way that's still backward compatible for instances which have already started using the manual numbering.

One way would be the dragging or up and down buttons I suggested, but a simpler approach might be a button to renumber all the articles with plenty of space in between. This would still require the moderator knowing the sequence numbers of the articles in order to know how to place a new or moved article where they want it though.

Monica Cellio‭ wrote 5 days ago

My first language was BASIC, too. That pain never completely goes away. :-)

Some sort of visual interface would be great, drag&drop or even +/- controls. I don't know how hard that is, but this isn't the only place where we want that sort of interface. (Being able to reorder the communities you see in the drop-down and on the dashboard, and maybe that tab on your profile, would be pretty sweet.)