Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the "town hall" (meta-discussion site) for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on "Related posts" does not examine links in comments

Parent

"Related posts" does not examine links in comments

+4
−0

"Draft loaded. You had edited this before but haven't saved it. We loaded the edits for you." has a bunch of related posts linked in its first comment thread, but the posts don't appear in the sidebar in the special green "Related Posts" box.

Is that intentional, accidental, or just planned-but-not-implemented?

History

2 comment threads

It's neither of those - at the moment the Related Posts feature only displays duplicates. We're open ... (2 comments)
What "related posts"? (2 comments)
Post
+3
−0

Already noted in a comment, but to expand a bit: currently the "related" section shows only questions that have been closed as a duplicate of the current one. We called it "related", not "duplicated by", because this was meant to be a first step. In particular, we've heard the feedback that people want to see what questions are closed as a duplicate of the current one to help in curating -- for example, if you're making a major edit, you want to either make sure it's still a duplicate or reopen the now-not-duplicates, depending. So we started with that type of related link, with the idea that there would be more later.

One approach would be to automatically detect links on the page and "promote" them to the "related" section. An alternate idea I'd like to explore is making this an intentional list. People might link to all sorts of things, especially in comments -- that doesn't mean they're related to the question. Rather than possibly overwhelming the section with not-really-related links, can we come up with a way for people to add links to that section explicitly? I'm imagining some scheme where anyone (or almost anyone) can suggest a link, and people with some ability to be determined can approve or reject suggestions. The ability doesn't need to be as "heavyweight" as reviewing edits or closing questions; maybe "participate everywhere" is enough, particularly if editors and curators can remove links, or maybe we can add a new ability.

History

2 comment threads

Fully manual means it won't happen (2 comments)
Intentional list (2 comments)
Intentional list
trichoplax‭ wrote 10 months ago

I like your suggestion of making the list intentional. In my answer I suggested including everything and having a way to remove unwanted ones, but perhaps it would be better to include nothing by default and either let people with the ability manually add to the list as you suggest, or possibly have an expandable list of possible links to add, gathered from the question, answers, and comments (visible only to people with the ability and collapsed rather than add them to Related Posts by default).

Monica Cellio‭ wrote 10 months ago

An expandable list of suggestions sounds very helpful.