Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Should we show tags before the body, to provide context for reading the question?

Parent

Should we show tags before the body, to provide context for reading the question?

+10
−0

Today I saw the following question on Software Dev (this is the beginning):

title and first paragraph could apply to several languages

(rest of post...)

The title, "connect with SLOT/SIGNAL:QPushButton clicked signal not received by main window" sounds like it could be about one of several languages. From the web context I was guessing Javascript. As I read further I eventually saw MainWindow.cpp, which told me it's actually C++.

Down at the bottom I saw the tags:

c++, qt

On the one hand, you could argue that if I don't know enough to recognize the library (and thus know its language) then I shouldn't be answering the question. And that's true! I had no intention of answering the question. I read the question and its answers to learn something, and wondered if I should have better context for what I would be learning.

Would it make more sense to display the tags under the title, something like this?

mockup: title, tags, then body

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (1 comment)
Post
+1
−2

I think that questions should be able to stand on their own without the use of tags, and so tags should be unnecessary to display at all. Not to say they have no use - it's helpful if you want to know some information about a question at a glance, such as when looking at the feed - but if you need to read the tags to understand the question content itself (in your example it sounds like they didn't specify the library in their post), then something is wrong with the question; that information should be edited in. (Of course, even then, you might not understand it, but that's just a lack of knowledge.)

I don't see much point in moving the tags to the top, but that's just because I don't think it should matter either way.


On a slight tangent, but I thought I'd address this:

On the one hand, you could argue that if I don't know enough to recognize the library (and thus know its language) then I shouldn't be answering the question. And that's true! I had no intention of answering the question. I read the question and its answers to learn something, and wondered if I should have better context for what I would be learning.

Randomly poking into a question without having any background knowledge is gonna be confusing, no matter where the tags are placed. If you can't tell what language the question is, then you probably won't learn much from the question or the answer. Sure, you might now know how to fix a click signal not being received by the main window using the QT library, but you still don't know what any of that means.

Basically, if you didn't understand the question without tags, then you aren't going to understand the question much better with them. That's just going to be how it is.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (6 comments)
General comments
Monica Cellio‭ wrote about 4 years ago

I understand (some stuff about) web client code in the abstract. I think there's room to learn something from that question even if I'm not a C++ programmer.

Moshi‭ wrote about 4 years ago · edited about 4 years ago

@MonicaCellio the QT library isn't a web client library though? It's a GUI library/application framework.

ShowMeBillyJo‭ wrote about 4 years ago

@Moshi The point isn't whether QT is or isn't a web framework, it's that a novice or non-practitioner could be interested in the (any) question too.

Moshi‭ wrote about 4 years ago · edited about 4 years ago

@ShowMeBillyJo I'm sure novices could be interested in many things they don't understand. My point was, Monica didn't even know what the question was about, even after looking at the tags - . Like I said in my post, "sure, you might now know how to fix a click signal not being received by the main window using the QT library, but you still don't know what any of that means." Tags just aren't going to solve a knowledge gap.

ShowMeBillyJo‭ wrote about 4 years ago

@Moshi They don't need to solve the gap, they only need to provide context which is what Monica's question is about.

Moshi‭ wrote about 4 years ago

@ShowMeBillyJo Providing context is solving the knowledge gap of knowledge of context. However, readers still have to have to be able to understand the context, and if they do then tags should be unnecessary for them anyway.