I think making the user experience better and more accessible for a wider range of users is a good discussion to have. Some people have different visual acuity than others, and we wouldn't want to inadvertently exclude someone or make their experience worse when accommodating them can be as simple as a CSS change.

@ShowMeBillyJo I'm afraid it leads to endless discussion about styles. There are FrontEnd&Design leaders already - if someone has a good proposal why not contact them directly?

if someone has a good proposal why not contact them directly? <== we do that all the time ==> this is not a case because I thought reactions would be mixed instead of mostly positive

@FoggyFinder I'm making a particular point about material issues of accessibility for users who are dis/differently-abled. This isn't a theoretical, slippery-slope discussion for them, it's real life.

@ShowMeBillyJo You seems like ignoring the second part of my comment. Have you attempted to point out on this existent issue through discord chat or any other way ?

@FoggyFinder No, because I don't have anything to add to @8063's response.

@ShowMeBillyJo Thanks, got it. May I ask why did you think so (this is not a case because I thought reactions would be mixed instead of mostly positive)? If something is clearly useful and doesn't require much efforts then why CoDidact leaders would opposite (to clarify: partially, i.e. mixed reaction) the proposal?

If you think current style push away some people cause they have some issues with vision why this thesis isn't included to the Q? Links to researches would be helpful as well.

I'm disengaging from this conversation now. I made my point, I've explained myself, and I stand by it. IMO anything more than that is scope-creep from the Q.

IMO anything more than that is scope-creep from the Q. @ShowMeBillyJo‭ Agree. Though I don't think off-topic conversation is something bad on meta.