Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Let us have more relevant tooltips for up/down vote buttons

Post

Let us have more relevant tooltips for up/down vote buttons

+11
−1

Sometimes when stumbling across a question I wonder if I should upvote / downvote or not. When this happened on SE sites, I hovered over the buttons and read the description.

Currently, Codidact seems to inform me about the change in the total score (e.g. 0.666667), but this is not particularly useful.

I think we should have tooltips with static text indicating when it is appropriate to up/down vote. A per-site setting (thanks Mithical for this idea) would be even better since the generic "useful, shows some effort..." clearly does not fit to every community.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (3 comments)
General comments
manassehkatz‭ wrote about 4 years ago · edited about 4 years ago

the generic "useful, shows some effort..." clearly does not fit to every community. Especially Code Golf, where it is more like true "voting", but also Meta and some others. In some cases a +1 is almost a "like". (Except that I don't like "like", nor do I like using the word like too much :-) )

Moshi‭ wrote about 4 years ago

This could even be a per-category setting - ex. on Software, the hover text would probably be different for the main Q&A and for Code Review.

Alexei‭ wrote about 4 years ago

@Moshi - yes, per category makes more sense. E.g. In meta +1 mostly means "I agree" rather than "it is useful". This distinction is important for new users who might get some downvotes on meta simply because the community disagrees, not that the post includes incorrect information.