Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Users Search
Help Dashboard Sign In Sign Up
Q&A Blog
Q&A
Posts Tags Edits
Ask Question

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Separate Languages from Linguistics?

Post

Separate Languages from Linguistics? [closed]

+3
−3

Closed as off topic by Monica Cellio‭ on Nov 12, 2020 at 20:15

This question is not within the scope of Codidact Meta.

This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.

Stack exchange separates languages from linguistics for good reasons. they're not the same thing. linguistics is an academic subject.

and why combine all the languages on one post? like stack, why not ONE language for each community?

discussion
posted about 4 years ago
user card
accounting, identify this location‭
4 0 -21 0
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (6 comments)
General comments
Olin Lathrop‭ wrote about 4 years ago · edited about 4 years ago
copy link

This should be in the Site Proposals category, or possibly in the Languages site meta. This isn't a main-site meta issue.

Olin Lathrop‭ wrote about 4 years ago
copy link

When I clicked CLOSE, I was expecting to add one vote to closing, not have my action unilaterally close the post. Oh well. It really should be in the other category.

Moshi‭ wrote about 4 years ago
copy link

Reopened: Site proposals is for site proposals.

Olin Lathrop‭ wrote about 4 years ago
copy link

@Moshi: Right, but this isn't in the Site Proposals category.

Monica Cellio‭ wrote about 4 years ago
copy link

I've closed this here, as it is a community-specific matter that is more properly discussed on Languages & Linguistics Meta. You are welcome to bring it up there, taking into account the feedback you got here.

Moshi‭ wrote about 4 years ago
copy link

@OlinLathrop Right, and this isn't a site proposal. It's a weird policy-ish question which probably should've been tagged [support] but it's still not a site proposal.