Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics

Dashboard
Notifications
Mark all as read
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Separate Languages from Linguistics? [closed]

+2
−3

Closed as off topic by Monica Cellio‭ on Nov 12, 2020 at 20:15

This question is not within the scope of Codidact Meta.

This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.

Stack exchange separates languages from linguistics for good reasons. they're not the same thing. linguistics is an academic subject.

and why combine all the languages on one post? like stack, why not ONE language for each community?

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

6 comments

This should be in the Site Proposals category, or possibly in the Languages site meta. This isn't a main-site meta issue. Olin Lathrop‭ 2 months ago

When I clicked CLOSE, I was expecting to add one vote to closing, not have my action unilaterally close the post. Oh well. It really should be in the other category. Olin Lathrop‭ 2 months ago

Reopened: Site proposals is for site proposals. Moshi‭ 2 months ago

@Moshi: Right, but this isn't in the Site Proposals category. Olin Lathrop‭ 2 months ago

I've closed this here, as it is a community-specific matter that is more properly discussed on Languages & Linguistics Meta. You are welcome to bring it up there, taking into account the feedback you got here. Monica Cellio‭ 2 months ago

Show 1 more comments

1 answer

+3
−1

The reason is quite simple. We don't have enough people for more than one community. Also, a lot of people interested in one language are already bilingual or are interested in more than one language. By having a supersite, we increase the pool of answerers for any given language.

Secondly, I think that your assumption that questions about languages and questions about linguistics are mutually exclusive is quite off. Linguistics is, quite simply, the study of language, so it makes little sense to separate the two except for traffic purposes - and if we get to that point, I would propose using Codidact categories rather than a separate site.

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment

No, there really is basically no overlap between linguistics and the kind of vocabulary/etymology/translation requests that SE and the new Codidact L&L site get. curiousdannii‭ 2 months ago

This community is part of the Codidact network. We have other communities too — take a look!

You can also join us in chat!

Want to advertise this community? Use our templates!