Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Initial revision of a question missing in its history

Post

Initial revision of a question missing in its history

+3
−0

I noticed that the initial version of a question is missing in its history.

The post Can we have a button to insert a table in posts? was asked on November 25, and on November 29 marked as [tag:status-completed]. However, in its history there is just the last action, not the initial revision.

I checked if this has to do with me being the OP and seeing a different version of the History, but another question of mine that was edited by others users shows well. Also, checking this in an incognito window showed the same.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (1 comment)
General comments
Monica Cellio‭ wrote about 4 years ago

I suspect it has to do with when it was asked, i.e. during the database upgrade. I've asked our DB person to check whether the sync for new changes missed this.