Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Is it intended to have negative reputation?

Post

Is it intended to have negative reputation? [duplicate]

+3
−0

Closed as duplicate by Monica Cellio‭ on Jan 12, 2021 at 22:23

This question has been addressed elsewhere. See: Why can users get negative reputation?

This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.

I don't know if this is status-bydesign, but this looks like a bug to me:

negative reputation

Is this intended behavior? Seems a bit weird to me if it is.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (3 comments)
General comments
10 Rep‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

Ahh, that makes sense.

Olin Lathrop‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

Of course the whole concept of rep on a meta site doesn't make much sense in the first place.

10 Rep‭ wrote almost 4 years ago

@Olin Lathrop I disagree. I like codidact because of that. People who make the site run in the first place are the ones who should also get rewarded with rep. Just because Stack Exchange doesn't do it doesn't mean codidact should switch.