Can you provide these six bullet points as separate posts, please? Some things I agree with, some I don't, so I didn't vote here.

#1 The first row is categories, which SE doesn't have. Merging the two rows wouldn't be a good idea since it'd make it more confusing, imo. #3 Why do you think that the number of answers is more relevant than the last activity? neither of them are particularly useful to understanding the question, are they? #4 Ads were supposed to be more analogous to SE's Hot Network Questions (which are also located on the right). 'Related posts' are a pending feature request, I'll try to find the discussion.

Regarding #6: Codidact's philosophy is to devalue 'reputation score'. A good answer is a good answer regardless of the reputation of the one posting it. On the other side, a good user should be evaluated using more nuanced metrics than how high their score is (e.g. A user with a 100 'good' posts and 60 'bad' posts would have a higher rep than a user with 50 good posts 0 bad)

What Zerotime said. These need to be separate so we can vote on and discuss them separately.

By the way, the numbering issue is a bug, see https://meta.codidact.com/posts/278500

@Moshi not a bug, just how Markdown works. All lists start at 1 unless you use HTML.

OP, please bear in mind that Codidact is not trying to be SE. We do things differently, we have different features, so the design and what's emphasised or de-emphasised is necessarily going to be different.

The design considerations are different, as Art said. Still, we are open to discussing specific aspects. Some of our design principles are different and that affects layout; categories, for example, are fundamental, and SE doesn't do that at all. Some things can be adjusted; I've thought about moving posting time (and license) over to the left too, for example. We want to work together with our communities. This'll never be an SE clone, but we welcome feedback about what isn't working here.