Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Comments on How can we make Codidact more friendly for askers?
Parent
How can we make Codidact more friendly for askers?
Most of the sites are struggling to get questions and while it seems to me at least that more effort has been put into optimizing for the answerers than for the askers.
To put it another way, there are lots and lots of sites on the internet where one could get their question answered, why should they ask it here?
Recently for me, it has not so much been that I don't have questions but more that the cost of writing questions is has not been worth the benefit.
What can we do to encourage people to ask questions here?
Chicken, meet egg. In many cases, the askers are much less expert than the answerers. The experts are the ones creati …
4y ago
This is very half-baked and just brainstorming at the moment, but it'd be good if askers received some sort of feedback …
4y ago
Elaborating on the thoughts of @PeterCooperJr., it might be sensible to provide some meta statistics on each site on th …
4y ago
A lot of Codidact's distinctives, as Manasseh notes in comments on another answer, are about how the Codidact team and t …
4y ago
Don't shoot the messenger. What about assimilating Codidact's website design — just this, nothing else, definitely not t …
4y ago
How can we make Codidact more friendly for askers? That's the wrong question. We aren't unfriendly to askers. The r …
4y ago
I think we must commence the Accounting, Economics, Finance forthwith to take advantage of the current bull U.S. stock m …
4y ago
I'll try not to repeat what's already written here. 1. Codidact just feels too cluttered compared to S.E. — see http …
4y ago
Post
How can we make Codidact more friendly for askers?
That's the wrong question. We aren't unfriendly to askers. The real question is:
What can we do to encourage people to ask questions here?
There are two necessary conditions to have a site that gets a good volume of questions:
- Good answers need to be forthcoming quickly.
- People need to know about the site to ask in the first place.
Our sites were started by the small active core on existing Q&A sites elsewhere. We generally do OK at #1.
We suck at #2.
The core group of each site needs to do some work to get the word out. Some ways individuals can do this:
- Stop answering Elsewhere where you were recognized as one of the experts, and put a note on your profile pointing to here. Some followers will notice you aren't answering anymore, and check your profile. Others will bump into some good answers of yours, and might be curious who this person is that wrote all those good answers.
- Personally invite people you know that are experts in the subject matter to come here, and then do #1 above, like you did.
- Whenever you interact with others in the subject domain of a site, mention Codidact when possible and not inappropriate. This is harder with Covid, but tradeshows and other subject domain gatherings are a good place to do this.
This is an area where the Codidact organization should help once it is up and running enough to accept donations and actually have a little money to spend. Printing up "business cards" for each site would be useful. These would then be distributed to the few top rep people on each site, who then hand them out in situations as mentioned above. Others could get them too when requested, like before heading off to a tradeshow or teaching a class.
Basically, some marketing money should be allocated to each site. I wouldn't make it a requirement, but the core group of each site should at least be asked to contribute once the mechanisms are in place.
However, probably by far the most significant way the inquisitive masses find out about us is when we pop up as a hit to a question posed to a search engine. One thing significantly holding us back here is all the duplicate content we scraped from SE. Recent tests have shown that this duplicate content is seriously hurting us. It has effectively black-listed the Writing, Outdoors, and Scientific Speculation sites, and seems to be having some negative impact on all the sites. Until this is fixed, any other effort to get more users on those sites is pretty much pointless.
Then there is the simple issue of critical mass. It takes lots of good answers to attract more questions. We have to realize this is a slow process initially.
0 comment threads