Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Disallowing quoting question parts in answers, rather, in comments only

Parent

Disallowing quoting question parts in answers, rather, in comments only

+0
−12

Quoting parts of questions in answers is a problem because it prevents the legitimacy of a question's OP to try to improve a bad question in case community members think the question is bad by heavily downvoting it, let along, explaining severe problems unclarity or misleadingness in the question.

This could be overcome by allowing quoting question parts only in comments when seeking clarifications for allegedly unclear information or when pointing out allegedly misleading information in a question.

If we agree that quoting question parts in answers is a serious problem, the only solution I find to it is to editorially remove any such quoting, so an OP could try to improve a question and no misleading would take place.

In plea, share your thoughts about this.


PS, I start this topic after a situation were I shouldn't try to improve this question of mine.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (2 comments)
Post
+6
−3

Bad idea.

Quoting parts of a question in an answer is useful because:

  1. It makes it clear what exactly is being replied to.
  2. It protects the answerer from changes to the question.
  3. The quotes can act somewhat as headings in the answer. It is easier to find a particular part of an answer that way. Headings can be even better for this, but this is a side advantage of quotes.

You seem to want to pretend that something you wrote originally never happened. Remember that you did actually write it. Like most things on the internet, once it's out there, it's out there.

It is quite unfair to the volunteers that took the time to answer a question if that question is then changed, and the answer now looks bad. Downvotes to the answer can happen in such cases, even though the answer matched the question at the time it was written.


I think that an answer is not a set of replies as that is what comments are for.

Content doesn't belong in comments. Answering in comments circumvents the peer review system and closing of questions. Comments are only for meta-issues about the question, like asking for clarification or making suggestions to the post author.

by that logic, no one can improve a question and "bad" questions are deemed to be "bad" pieces of content forever... Let along, when there is edit history.

Questions can be improved. Such improvements should not materially change the content of the question, though. There is a difference between "improving" and "changing". The system of questions with answers doesn't work when questions are moving targets. If the right question was not originally asked, it is better to ask a new question than to change an old one.

Your motivation is to avoid appearing stupid when an obvious problem with a question is brought to light. But what you propose pushes that problem instead onto those answering the original question. That would be quite unfair.

Once you write something publicly, accept that it's out there. And yes, people will judge you accordingly. That's how the world works, like it or not. The best response is usually to avoid attracting attention to it and let it blow over. Keep in mind that everyone has posted something stupid publicly at some time. It's part of engaging with the world. If that really bothers you so much, then be more careful with what you write.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (2 comments)
General comments
deleted user wrote over 3 years ago

I recognize three parts in your answer. About the first one: It makes it clear what exactly is being replied to. I think that an answer is not a set of replies as that is what comments are for. It protects the answerer from changes to the question. these aren't bad in general. The quotes can act somewhat as headings in the answer. well, I'd recommend anyone to just use headings.

deleted user wrote over 3 years ago

About the second one: You seem to want to pretend that something you wrote originally never happened after you edit it out. I didn't mean that for a minute; by that logic, no one can improve a question and "bad" questions are deemed to be "bad" pieces of content forever... Let along, when there is edit history...