Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Reputation is disappeared from user's card recently

Parent

Reputation is disappeared from user's card recently

+3
−0

Not sure exactly when but for some time I don't see r in a user's card. From what I can tell it happens only on Meta and, for example, on SD it is still visible.

An additional context: Heads up: small design changes, a better user card and some long-expected features

Quote from there

From now on, communities can decide, which details are supposed to be shown on it.

I don't remember discussions lately to change the settings to another one here. Was the line with total score is removed purposely or this is a bug?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+7
−1

This was intentional; we're testing out deemphasizing reputation here on Meta. This was a decision by the Codidact Team.

Of course, if it turns out that it's detrimental somehow to not show the reputation number, or if the community decides that they really want it back, it'll be reinstated. But we'd like to find out for a while what it's like having reputation be much less of a focus when you look at a post - for instance, it allows you to judge a post by what it says and not by how much reputation the author has.

It's worth noting that the original plan for Codidact was to not have reputation at all. Since we ended up working off of software that already included reputation, we wound up having it kinda by default. However, we're looking at ways to reduce the importance and prominence of it, and looking into other options for measuring expertise in subject matter (and in how to use the tools of the site).

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (8 comments)
General comments
FoggyFinder‭ wrote over 3 years ago

Downvote. I understand the reasons behind it and somewhere even agree. But to me such a big change should be discussed with community first. It doesn't look good to me. Especially because it was removed silently despite the fact that there was a clear statement: "the rep in the header is back, until we've found a suitable replacement/alternative/solution". That's not right. Please, at least announce about crucial changes first. Give community a chance to provide feedback first.

Mithical‭ wrote over 3 years ago

@FoggyFinder - That's a good point. We'll keep that in mind going forward from here.

FoggyFinder‭ wrote over 3 years ago

awesome, thank you

celtschk‭ wrote over 3 years ago

While I do not miss reputation as such, I do miss being notified about up/downvotes on my posts. Reputation changes were a proxy to that. Indeed, on SE I liked the distinct rep points on votes of questions and answers (as long as those existed) exactly because it allowed be to immediately see whether the vote was on a question or an answer. I don't care much about the points as such, but I do care about which of my posts were voted on, and in which way.

Monica Cellio‭ wrote over 3 years ago

@celtschk‭ agreed; that's important feedback that is currently missing. We plan to add information about voting activity (time-based) to the user profile, filling the same niche as SE's reputation tab, because it's important to know which posts are getting attention. Once we have that we can figure out what to do with notifications; we'll want community input on that.

Lundin‭ wrote over 3 years ago

I'd also question the relevance of rep on meta. From experience of SO, my highest voted posts by far are those containing complaints about something. This after posting some hundreds of diverse posts, feature suggestions, moderation/tag clean-up stuff, misc discussions, helping newbies etc. It's always the complaints that give you high meta rep... so it's a very flawed system. Disabling votes and rep on meta is a good idea, though we might then need to implement a poll system instead.

Mithrandir24601‭ wrote over 3 years ago

@Lundin For things like bug reports I agree that voting is a bit superfluous but I think voting in e.g. feature requests and announcements is still useful

Lundin‭ wrote over 3 years ago

@Mithrandir24601‭ It's pretty much only useful when someone makes a proposal of something new. It's counter-productive when someone just wants to discuss something and toss around ideas. And it doesn't make the slightest sense for things like bug reports, support requests etc. What does voting even mean then? "Yes, I agree that you are having this bug"... "No, I don't agree that you need help with this". Better then if the poster can add a poll when they think there's a need for one.