Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Get a [faq] tag, mods!

Parent

Get a [faq] tag, mods!

+1
−6

This applies on all meta sites, so hear me out. It would actually be nice if we had a new moderator tag in Codidact called faq.

What's the purpose?

Somewhere Else has this tag on their meta sites too, and it basically applies if the question is considered "frequently-asked" by users around the network. Strangely enough, Codidact doesn't have a FAQ tag at all, and it'd really help if we get such mod tag.

Where does the tag apply?

Like I said already, the tag is applied on questions considered "frequently-asked". An example is this popular question.

With those settled, can we have the moderator-only tag faq?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

FAQ seems a strange tag for Q&A (1 comment)
No consensus (1 comment)
Post
+1
−0

I started to write this as a comment in response to @Canina's answer, but realized it's a different proposal on it's own. Bit of brainstorming:

A FAQ is not necessarily some help page with everything written down. It could as well be integrated site support. Such a FAQ system would have:

  • A way for nominating questions for FAQ status (flagging etc).
  • A way of voting if such a nominated question should get/lose FAQ status. The voting would be automatically triggered whenever someone makes a nomination, resulting in a public poll.
  • A way of presenting a collection of links with FAQ status. Preferably based on tags. So you could have an expandable view based on tags.

Suppose for example there's a question on Software Development describing how to implement toString for a Java class properly. Someone nominates it, the community votes and it gets FAQ status. Using tags from the post such "java", "tostring", "strings", it might be possible to build an expandable view: Java -> Strings -> toString.

Now if I have a question about string handling in Java, I could easily go check if there's a FAQ for it.

This would work in harmony with "canonical dupe", user-maintained FAQ and so on.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

This is about meta categories, not general ones. (2 comments)
This is about meta categories, not general ones.
General Sebast1an‭ wrote about 3 years ago

I don't think you get the point. You mentioned here, specifically about Software Development CD, all about the discussion in the general sites. Not what I'm talking about, really.

Let's look back Somewhere Else, on the meta sites, not the main/general ones. It's about guidance on the network, and it would really help if Codidact had such a tag. In other words, general sites shouldn't be having such tag. You get what I mean?

Lundin‭ wrote about 3 years ago

General Sebast1an‭ I don't see how the metas and main categories are different in this regard. The need to assemble a FAQ will eventually happen everywhere, when the site gets enough activity.