Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Users Search
Help Dashboard Sign In Sign Up
Q&A Blog
Q&A
Posts Tags Edits
Ask Question

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Adding a comment to an existing thread results in Internal Server Error, but the comment gets added

Post

Adding a comment to an existing thread results in Internal Server Error, but the comment gets added

+2
−0

I added a comment just now to an existing thread to a question on Power Users.

Clicking "Add reply", the response was a "500 Server Error" page with the page title "Power Users - Internal Server Error". Uh oh.

When I looked at the comment thread, though, my new comment had been added.

The error ID is 63205e05-fd2f-4ee1-9907-de9d2375983c for the case I experienced.

bug status-completed comments
posted about 3 years ago
user card
Canina‭
70 78 760 152
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Yes, still happening (8 comments)
still happening? (3 comments)
Yes, still happening
Monica Cellio‭ wrote about 3 years ago
copy link

This just happened to me on Power Users, posting on https://powerusers.codidact.com/comments/thread/4171 with this error code: 48bd593f-6bcf-402b-87e6-ce624c068a02.

deleted user wrote about 3 years ago
copy link

I think it haven’t deployed... Sau had Pull Requested and it was merged to develop. I will link that PR whenever I am on laptop

Canina‭ wrote about 3 years ago
copy link

Monica Cellio‭ I just got the same behavior, also on Power Users. Error ID 10d4a828-7b0c-4bc9-81f7-8a8a0edb0a59, comment thread https://powerusers.codidact.com/comments/thread/4177.

deleted user wrote about 3 years ago · edited about 3 years ago
copy link

https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/639

Edit : Seems to me, it have been deployed but, something else going to happen now..

FoggyFinder‭ wrote about 3 years ago
copy link

deleted useri These changes were merged but aren't deployed yet.

Canina‭ wrote about 3 years ago · edited about 3 years ago
copy link

deleted user The linked PR was committed and merged Aug 21, but the footer here indicates that the qpixel version running is from Aug 19. So unless someone has invented time travel without telling the rest of us, the changes in PR#639 can't possibly be in the running code.

Monica Cellio‭ wrote about 3 years ago
copy link

I had incorrectly marked this as status-complete, having misunderstood the timeline. Sorry about that!

sau226‭ wrote about 3 years ago
copy link

The changes are now deployed to production and these errors should no longer occur.