Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Actively investing in non niche network websites

Parent

Actively investing in non niche network websites

+2
−8

I think that the website must have some new communities in "piquant" topics to survive (to become enough well-known and contributed in the next say, 50 years).

"piquant" topics would be in my opinion (just examples, no connection to existing site proposals):

  • Cosmetics
  • Chemistry
  • Biology
  • Finance
  • Accounting

The last website added to the network is about tabletop games and barely has any posts in it (it doesn't have a pager); I think it was a too of a "niche" choice and the owners of the network should actively seek website ideas in fields that may be less interesting for them personally.

The aims for this post are to:

  1. Suggesting to community managers to consider replacing the current mechanism for community proposal (for example, allow just one person to start a community given relevant background in the field and in moderation)
  2. Suggesting to community members to further emphasis non niche topics so to prefer creating communities primarily on general audience topics
History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

How are these topics piquant? (2 comments)
Post
+8
−1

We don't just spin up communities about topics that interest us personally - all new communities go through the Site Proposal process here on Meta. The process includes making sure that there is a minimum number of people committed to using the proposed new community. If you believe that these topics would be well-received as proposals, then by all means post them as proposals.

In any case, please keep in mind that growth for growth's sake isn't our main goal. We want to support the needs and wants of the people using our network - not spinning up new communities that nobody is committed to on the hope that it'll attract users. Personally, despite being a relatively small group of people right now, I've found our TTRPG community quite useful.

We recognize that some of our communities are struggling for users, and the team is actively looking at ways to grow our user base in a reasonable way, such as promoting our existing communities to relevant audiences.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

Growth is great (1 comment)
I didn't say or mean to say that `growth for growth's sake isn't our main goal`, I meant to bring mor... (1 comment)
I didn't say or mean to say that `growth for growth's sake isn't our main goal`, I meant to bring mor...
deleted user wrote over 2 years ago · edited over 2 years ago

I didn't say or mean to say that growth for growth's sake is a main goal of the owners of this network or that it should be, I meant to show the importance in bringing more people to the site as contributors; that's why I used the term contributors; I personally believe that any site without enough contribution just won't "survive" and I want CD to survive and thrive.