Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Is it possible to merge Power Users and Linux Systems? Would Codidact benefit from it?

Post

Is it possible to merge Power Users and Linux Systems? Would Codidact benefit from it?

+9
−0

One of the concerns of How can we grow this community posts (see on Power Users and on Linux Systems) is that the sites may not be active enough, resulting in a poor first impression.

If my calculations are correct, LS gets an average of 2 questions per week and PU gets 5.

Given the scope of LS is (arguably?) a subset of PU and that both communities are still small, wouldn't Codidact benefit from merging the two sites — assuming it is doable — at least for the time being?

Adding Linux (or Unix, Macos, etc.) tags where appropriate would not be complicated.

Are there drawbacks or other advantages I overlooked in merging? Any opinion is appreciated.

Per-community Meta surveys about this:

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Things to consider (4 comments)
Should be up to the two communities (1 comment)
Things to consider
Trilarion‭ wrote almost 3 years ago

How much content overlap is there? (Quite a lot, power user could actually have OS specific categories) Do the respective communities agree with that? (One would need to ask on their Metas) Does the software support that operation? (Merging of two sites, adding tags, selecting a new design set, how to merge site specific settings?) How could we measure the success of such a merger? (Questions or answers or views per time?)

Monica Cellio‭ wrote almost 3 years ago

Re "does the software support it?": I think we can assume that if this is what both communities want, we can find a way to do it. (Probably through direct database manipulation by one of the devs with access.)

Trilarion‭ wrote almost 3 years ago

Monica Cellio‭ Or it could become even a full-flegded feature over time. Not only mergers but also splits are imaginable. It sounds not trivial though. What about user privileges, or links in the edit history or for search engines a rewrite of old URLs (people might have linked from outside to questions or answers on these sites). The technical requirements for such an operation could probably be discussed separately.

Monica Cellio‭ wrote almost 3 years ago

Trilarion‭ agreed -- not trivial, but when we set up Software Dev we did so anticipating that sub-communities might eventually split off, so nothing prevents it AFAIK other than deciding about things like the points you raised. Merger is probably the easier case: nobody's going to lose abilities, and URL redirects can be kept in place. If the two communities decide they want to merge (which should be discussed on both of their metas), then we can work out the technical plan for how to do it.

Skipping 2 deleted comments.