Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Should we modify the default (front) page for anonymous visitors?

Post

Should we modify the default (front) page for anonymous visitors?

+6
−1

A complaint we've heard a lot is that when a community's front page has many questions that are not well-received, it deters visitors. (It also deters some people who are already here, I know.) This is not a good look:

post list: 0/0, 0/-2, 2/-5, 0/-2, 0/-3, 0/-6, 1/-1, 0/-3

I'm trying not to embarrass any individuals (though you can go to the obvious community and look). These posts are from several different people, not one.

Should we filter the question list for people who are not logged in? If so, should we also filter it for new users (to be defined), so they don't get a shock right after signup?

I don't think we can (with good performance) do something like "no more than one post meeting these criteria"; I think if we're going to filter things out of the logged-out view, we need to be able to evaluate each post on its own.

(I'll make my proposal an answer, so it will be on equal footing with others' proposals.)

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Sounds like treating the symptoms instead of the causes (2 comments)
Remove closed posts from view? (2 comments)
Sounds like treating the symptoms instead of the causes
hkotsubo‭ wrote about 3 years ago

Although I agree that a front page like that gives a bad impression, it sounds to me that you're trying to treat the symptoms, not the cause.

If there are so many downvoted and/or closed questions, we should figure out why this is happening and attack those causes, in order to prevent it from happening - or at least minimize it (I don't have a suggestion, though, perhaps it needs a separate discussion for that).

Hiding poorly received questions sounds to me like pretending the problem doesn't exist. We should attack the problem's causes instead, in order to make sure users know how to create good quality content before posting, and ideally there would be no need to hide anything...

Trilarion‭ wrote about 3 years ago

hkotsubo‭ Kind of agree but I would do both. Showing only positive content to visitors is okay, after all they are likely more interested in reading something useful.

However, if people register you want to show them all the content, so they will discover the negatively scoring content soon anyway. We should look at the distribution of scores for new question and not only at the amount of new questions and if there are constantly badly scoring questions we should do something. The average/median score of recent questions should be a site health indicator and we should try to maximize it.