Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Is there a reason for preventing user profile content being less than 30 characters?

Post

Is there a reason for preventing user profile content being less than 30 characters?

+6
−0

Original GitHub issue:

GitHub issue raise more recently suggesting greater demand:


When editing my user profile the interface prevents me from entering fewer than 30 characters. I can understand imposing a minimum length on question titles and post content, but I don't see a reason that a profile page needs to be a certain length. Is there a reason I'm missing or was this just a default?

As one of our communities is for Code Golf, I can imagine some users might like to have quite short content in their profiles (code golf is all about expressing things as briefly as possible). As a test, I've set my profile to say "I'm succinct", which is significantly shorter than the 30 character minimum. I got around the interface-imposed minimum by adding extra HTML code, like this:

<p title="Or at least I aim to be...">I'm succinct.</p>

(...yes, the title text does show on hover in the profile, if anyone's wondering if that works)

If there isn't a reason for preventing short profiles, removing the limit would save people having to work around it.

If there is a good reason, let me know and I'll remove my workaround.

Related bug

If it turns out that there isn't a need to set a minimum length for a user profile, then maybe setting the minimum to zero would avoid having to add any special case code to fix this related bug: Once filled out, the user profile cannot be reverted to empty.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Probably post-rules overflow. (1 comment)
Probably post-rules overflow.
Monica Cellio‭ wrote about 2 years ago

My guess (haven't checked with someone who can confirm yet) is that profile descriptions are posts and posts have the restriction. For a question, answer, article, or other post type, a minimum length makes sense. I'm guessing that profiles inherited that -- an effect of design and not a specific decision about profiles. (How easy or hard it is to change this, I'm not yet sure.)