As much as the meter is a fantastic idea, it looks like a graphical glitch when it's empty (0 upvotes, 0 downvotes). I just mostly bailed on SE and jumped over here tonight, and when I first saw an empty meter, my brain stalled for a good few seconds trying to figure out what I was looking at before I finally realized it was probably a score meter. I later discovered I was right.

My personal vote is for the small font variant, but with a restyled meter that looks right even when blank.

I'll disagree with this one. I like the big fonts: easy to read at a glance, and the space is well occupied.

I really like Codidact's question list style by the way. Very uniform space distribution, comfortable to parse, 6 questions per screen height, while Somewhere Else I get only 4. Cheers to those who designed it.

Quasímodo‭ odd, I see no difference in the number of questions per screen height. At any rate, a smaller font would get you more content on a screen, not less. It's about ratio, and to me it is weird that score should be larger than title, for instance.

Keelan, in the last paragraph I was comparing Codidact to Stack Exchange (here some like to codename it to Somewhere Else).

Quasímodo‭ I know, me too.