Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Activity Pub Support

Post

Activity Pub Support

+7
−3

With Stack Exchange's apparent move towards accepting generative AI in the answers, people might be looking for alternatives. I, personally, recommend Codidact to people regularly.

I tried to determine if ActivityPub was supported, but didn't find anything in the roadmap or issues on Github. I'm wondering if adding ActivityPub support would be viable? It would be great if Codidact were one of the top Fediverse choices for StackExchange alternatives.

It seems to me that adding Fediverse support might draw in more developer support as well.

I'm not certain whether federation fits with the community goals or not, but wanted to broach the topic.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

4 comment threads

Some thoughts (2 comments)
Undefined terms (1 comment)
Can you say more about how this might work? (1 comment)
Some old discussions (1 comment)
Some thoughts
chris‭ wrote 11 months ago

This seems an ideal situation for decentralisation. Initially all you would need to be able to do is comment/upvote/answer questions over all sites. Kbin isn't too dissimilar, where you can start a thread that can be voted up/down and commented on - that can be installed across multiple servers, and a user on one server can follow a "magazine" on another (here for example you might follow @meta@codidact.com from elsewhere - and you'd see all the questions and be able to answer or comment on them). It would keep groups of communities separate but still interoperable, and if a site goes offline then the content is still visible from another federated instance. It would also not be necessary to create an account on every server hosting the Codidact software, and comments from other Fediverse/ActivityPub accounts would work too.

fausty‭ wrote 11 months ago

Yeah, my big preference is that I can use a single account to interact with a bunch of these sites. Certainly, there are benefits to having additional accounts, but for most things I'd like to just manage a single profile.