Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Inconsistent use of "abilities" and "privileges"

Parent

Inconsistent use of "abilities" and "privileges"

+2
−0

The Your abilities page looks something like this (depending on your current abilities):

The "Your abilities" page

To a moderator looking to grant or suspend abilities, there is a mod-only page called "Privileges", which looks something like this:

The "Privileges" page

Each of these pages uses "abilities" and "privileges" interchangeably. Should we use one word consistently?

If so, note that the URL for each of these pages is also inconsistent (one containing "abilities" and the other containing "privileges").

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+3
−0

I believe that this is actually intentional and not a bug, because these pages serve different purposes.

The /abilities page shows the abilities you can earn through your usage of the community. That's user-oriented, and part of the Abilities feature set.

The /priveleges page, though, is a bit different. It's not only used for abilities, but also granting other privileges. This is the view of a global admin:

Below the "recalculate abilities" button, and option to grant roles such as "moderator", "administrator", "global moderator", "global administrator", and "staff"

These aren't abilities and are granted independently of that system, so combining those two pages would be a mistake, in my opinion.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Further separation (2 comments)
Further separation
trichoplax‭ wrote 10 months ago

Thanks for explaining. With priviliges and abilities being two separate things, it might be worth making the separation more definite. The screenshot in this answer exclusively uses "privileges" in the Roles section, and "abilities" in the Recalc Abilities section, but the screenshots in the question seem to overlap a little:

  • In the Your Abilities page, the Moderator row mentions privileges (perhaps the real problem here is that Moderator does not belong in a table of abilities, with an Earned column, as it cannot be earned).
  • In the moderator view of the Privileges of user page, the heading of the page seems to clash with the title of the only table, Abilities. Thanks to this answer I now realise that the heading of the page makes sense when viewed by a global admin, as there are two tables and only one of them concerns abilities. Would it make sense to use a different heading for moderators, or would it be more confusing to have different people see a different heading?
Mithical‭ wrote 10 months ago

Yeah, I think we should take Moderator out of that list, for exactly that reason. I'm ambivalent on removing the "Abilities" heading for mods; we might add other features that can be suspended on a case-by-case basis, such as suggesting edits, which would be separate from the blocks of features that Abilities currently encompass. It's something to keep in mind when we rework the Abilities system, which is something we've been thinking about for a while now.