Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Users Search
Help Dashboard Sign In Sign Up
Q&A Blog
Q&A
Posts Tags Edits
Ask Question

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Proposal: Human-readable profile URLs

Parent

Proposal: Human-readable profile URLs

+2
−2

Would it be possible to have human-readable profile URLs instead of numbers?

e.g. https://meta.codidact.com/users/da5nsy or https://meta.codidact.com/users/@da5nsy rather than https://meta.codidact.com/users/64176

feature-request status-declined
posted over 1 year ago
CC0
1y ago by Monica Cellio‭
user card
da5nsy‭
4 0 17 0
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+9
−0

User names don't have to be unique (and platforms that require uniqueness tend to frustrate people who end up being Mike792 or whatever), so we need the numbers. Given that we need to include the number, we went for the shortest URL that uniquely identifies the user. Would it help if we added the name to the end, such as users/64176/da5nsy?

posted over 1 year ago
user card
Monica Cellio‭ staff
64 377 2269 838
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

> User names don't have to be unique Huh, wow, that's unusual. And kind of interesting. Isn't everyo... (2 comments)
> User names don't have to be unique Huh, wow, that's unusual. And kind of interesting. Isn't everyo...
da5nsy‭ wrote over 1 year ago · edited over 1 year ago
copy link

User names don't have to be unique

Huh, wow, that's unusual. And kind of interesting. Isn't everyone in this day and age used to having to come up with something unique for a username?

Would it help if we added the name to the end, such as users/64176/da5nsy?

Thanks for offering the suggestion, but IMO - no. For me, one of the appeals of having a human-readable URL is that I can quickly navigate to it directly without having to remember any additional info (so long as I remember the URL structure)

Monica Cellio‭ wrote over 1 year ago
copy link

I think part of the confusion is from terminology. Your user name is actually a display name, and those don't have to be unique. Your user ID must be unique, and that's the number. By analogy, your email address must be unique, but the name that shows up alongside it in your "from" line needn't be -- it's not used for routing or system-level identification, only human convenience.