Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Users Search
Help Dashboard Sign In Sign Up
Q&A Blog
Q&A
Posts Tags Edits
Ask Question

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Tag-only edits only sometimes have a tag diff

Post

Tag-only edits only sometimes have a tag diff

+2
−0

I noticed that the edit to the tags in this edit history does not have a tag diff section. It makes it appear that the second version of this post has no changes:

Edit history showing tags have changed but there is no tag diff section

For comparison, here is tag-only edit on another post, that does have a tag diff section:

Edit history showing a tag diff with 1 tag added

Notice that this one does not have a title diff or body diff, just a tag diff, whereas the previous example had a title diff and body diff with no visible changes, and no tag diff even though that's where the change had occurred.

bug post-history
posted 11 months ago
user card
trichoplax‭
176 60 575 254
History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

For debugging purposes, did you stumble across the edit after it was applied or before it was applied... (4 comments)
Reopened the GitHub issue.... (1 comment)
For debugging purposes, did you stumble across the edit after it was applied or before it was applied...
Taeir‭ wrote 10 months ago
copy link

For debugging purposes, did you stumble across the edit after it was applied or before it was applied?

trichoplax‭ wrote 10 months ago
copy link

I'm very confused by this question. I was sure I had kept my time travel a secret. Could you rephrase to help my parsing?

Taeir‭ wrote 9 months ago
copy link

The problem is probably that it is not possible to view the edit in the history before applying/accepting said edit. When viewing a suggested edit, it will contain all the correct information. After applying the suggested edit, the history will not contain all the correct information due to a bug that I have since found. That was what my question was about, but because it's not possible to view an edit in history before it is applied, it was actually not a correct question :)

trichoplax‭ wrote 9 months ago
copy link

I was very tired when I posted that comment and completely overlooked that you might mean a suggested edit. Reading it now, being more awake, it's perfectly clear that "applied" means "approved" rather than "submitted for approval". Thanks for being understanding.