Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on A vote in the meta category for the EE site reflected in my reputation. Is that a bug?

Parent

A vote in the meta category for the EE site reflected in my reputation. Is that a bug?

+4
−2

We've got a category for meta posts on the electrical engineering (EE) vsite. I've noticed that votes on my posts in the meta reflect in my reputation on the EE site. The votes on a local meta-EE shouldn't reflect on the reputation on EE. This looks like a bug (or a lack of feature), or a missing configuration.

Reputation should reflect what somebody knows about the subject matter of the site. If the upvotes in a meta count towards subject matter reputation, then it becomes easy to abuse the meta. If somebody wants cheap reputation, one can say something very popular along the lines of “free bread and circuses”, or just tell a joke, and get upvotes. But that doesn’t reflect his expertise in the subject matter, or his willingness to write quality Q&A. Meta shouldn't count towards reputation. The Old Republic SE got that one right.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (3 comments)
Post
+3
−4

All categories are treated equally; voting in any category affects reputation.

This is different to how it works on Stack Exchange, but that's just one of those differences - neither approach is necessarily the One True Way, this is just the one we've picked to go down.

Reputation won't be around for too much longer in any case, so this won't be an issue much longer.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

Outdated (2 comments)
General comments (4 comments)
Outdated
qwr‭ wrote over 1 year ago

"reputation won't be around much longer" written two years ago but still is around

Nick Alexeev‭ wrote 11 months ago

There's the second reason why this is outdated. Meta votes was removed from the reputation in 2023. [Cheers!] Could you change the tag of the question from "bydesign" to "completed", please?