Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on How to edit a post for small modifications without affecting the visibility of other posts?

Parent

How to edit a post for small modifications without affecting the visibility of other posts?

+4
−1

Related: Could we have a way to edit without bumping posts?


Motivation

I usually edit my own posts a lot of times in order to improve them. This put the corresponding post on top of the "main post page list" (for e.g. meta.codidact.com).

However, most of the time I do very little changes to my post (correct a typo, add a link, etc.), so it does not deserve to draw attention to the post in question.

So my post takes the place of other posts that would need more attention...

In this case, a general recommendation could be: "Avoid editing a post for small modifications (e.g. correct a typo) because it affects the visibility of other posts"

Starting from this postulate (which could obviously be discussed ;-), the question is:

How to edit a post for small modifications without affecting the visibility of other posts?

Proposal

A solution could be to allow the author of the edit to choose if they wants to put the post on the top of the list or not (the default behavior could be to move the post on top, as it is currently done).

This could be achieved, for e.g., by adding a check box at the end of the edit view which could look like this:

Example of the feature implemented with a check box in order to let the user choose if the post will be move to the top of the list or not

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Good idea. See Wikipedia... (1 comment)
Post
+2
−0

I like this, but...

I've often wanted this feature. I feel bad about cluttering the top of the question list when I make a minor typo fix on an old post.

However, having thought about it more over time, I can see a problem with letting a user decide which of their edits should be visible.

Misuse

If a user wants to make an edit that they expect will be disapproved of, and that may lead to their post being flagged for moderator attention, being able to keep their edit from appearing at the top of the question list would allow them to make the edit with much reduced risk of detection.

Moderation

One solution to this would be to allow the edit to be kept off the top of the question list, but notify moderators that the edit has been made so they can check this unscrupulous usage is not happening. However, this diverts work that can be done by the community to being only done by the moderators.

I see a moderator's role as dealing with overflow. A moderator should be solving problems that the community cannot solve. Anything that the community can deal with itself should not be referred to moderators. This leaves the maximum amount of moderator time available for the things that only they can handle.

Community moderation

For this reason I think it is important that every edit, no matter how small, results in the post going to the top of the question list. This way the editing user does not get to decide whether their edit is seen by the community, and the community can spot problems (and flag if necessary) rather than putting the full burden of monitoring all edits on a small number of moderators.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

Make it an option only for the original poster? (4 comments)
Guardrails? (3 comments)
Make it an option only for the original poster?
manassehkatz‭ wrote about 1 year ago

Is Misuse a significant concern if the original author makes the edit?

trichoplax‭ wrote about 1 year ago · edited about 1 year ago

I wouldn't expect it to be a concern to the original author. The problem is that anyone can be an original author. This change would give anyone the ability to make a post, wait until it drops off the front page, and then edit it to say something the community would have flagged had it not been kept from returning to the front page.

manassehkatz‭ wrote about 1 year ago

trichoplax‭ Why would it give anyone the ability? Why can't it be limited (as are certain other things) to the original author + high privilege (moderator/staff/etc.)?

trichoplax‭ wrote 9 months ago

Because anyone can make a post, so anyone can become an original author.

If the original author has the ability to edit their own post without the post going to the top of the question list, then a malicious user can introduce malicious content to the site as follows:

  1. Make a new post (so the malicious user is the original author of the new post).
  2. Wait until it drops off the front page.
  3. Make a malicious edit to their own post.