I like the idea, and I was going to suggest it myself.

However, I also understand the concerns of @trichoplax about the risk of abuse, e.g. "sneaky edits" that could fly under the radar.

I think a nice tradeoff solution would be IMO:

1. Allow minor edit checkbox only for people that have the edit privilege, just to filter out users that haven't shown some pattern of responsible editing behavior. In other words, suggested edits will always be bumped (maybe let the people authorizing the edit to choose whether the edit warrants a bump?).

2. For people doing an edit on their own posts and without the edit privilege, enable the checkbox, but change the behavior: the checkbox doesn't suppress bumping, it delays it until some time has passed from the latest edit (say 1h), so that people that make a flurry of small edits to their own posts can do that without multiple bumps. All the edits are "bumped together" once that time has elapsed from the last edit in the series. Moreover, to avoid people gaming the system by continuously editing the post to postpone a bump forever, bump the post anyway after some other given time (say a day).

3. Provide a new visualization option for posts, e.g. show minor edits, so that people wanting to check what's happening "down in the noise" can do that. In other words, the "minor edit" checkbox doesn't prevent the edit to be discovered by people wanting to check that out. In this way mods could periodically check the posts with minor edits just to see if something shady is going on.

4. To avoid careless bumping by privileged users, check the checkbox by default if the user hasn't changed much of the post, and also remind them they are going to perform a "minor edit" with some visual cue. In this way, a major edit is bumped unless the user wants otherwise, whereas a minor edit is not bumped, unless the user wants otherwise.

Note that in my idea the final choice is always on the (privileged) user (no forced choices). The system just lends a hand and suggests the most logical/common behavior (focus on personal responsibility here).

posted over 1 year ago

CC BY-SA 4.0

Lorenzo Donati‭

14 3 63 20

I like this, but...

I've often wanted this feature. I feel bad about cluttering the top of the question list when I make a minor typo fix on an old post.

However, having thought about it more over time, I can see a problem with letting a user decide which of their edits should be visible.

Misuse

If a user wants to make an edit that they expect will be disapproved of, and that may lead to their post being flagged for moderator attention, being able to keep their edit from appearing at the top of the question list would allow them to make the edit with much reduced risk of detection.

Moderation

One solution to this would be to allow the edit to be kept off the top of the question list, but notify moderators that the edit has been made so they can check this unscrupulous usage is not happening. However, this diverts work that can be done by the community to being only done by the moderators.

I see a moderator's role as dealing with overflow. A moderator should be solving problems that the community cannot solve. Anything that the community can deal with itself should not be referred to moderators. This leaves the maximum amount of moderator time available for the things that only they can handle.

Community moderation

For this reason I think it is important that every edit, no matter how small, results in the post going to the top of the question list. This way the editing user does not get to decide whether their edit is seen by the community, and the community can spot problems (and flag if necessary) rather than putting the full burden of monitoring all edits on a small number of moderators.

posted over 1 year ago

CC BY-SA 4.0

trichoplax‭

222 74 715 297

Maybe when our communities are much larger

I share the others' concerns about getting fresh eyes on edits to avoid abuse (or even just errors that would motivate a re-edit). As things stand, I think the concern about "drawing away attention" is greatly overstated. I'm generally willing to look at an entire page or so of results to try to find something I can actually answer, and I doubt I'm in the minority there. And, well, right now most of our communities have content dating back a year or more on the front page. On many sites, the most recent unanswered question dates back a year or more, too. So bumping your already relatively recent stuff is just not causing that much of a distraction. Bumping an answered, 2-year-old question could cause a problem if it weren't a rare occurrence, but there's still the option to search/filter for unanswered questions (we should probably make this easier!)

However, in a world where Codidact gets much larger and communities are receiving several posts per hour, I can see where there could get to be real competition between new questions and edits. It would become useful to have the default front-page view sort by the OP post date, but have a separate, easily-selected view that sorts by the most recent modification. It would also be useful for the "Edits" tab for categories to show recent unilateral edits, as well as just pending edits.

posted over 1 year ago

CC BY-SA 4.0

Karl Knechtel‭

23 36 149 28