Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on What do we do with suspected AI users?

Post

What do we do with suspected AI users?

+9
−1

I have noticed a user that I suspect may be posting AI generated content. What should I do in such a situation?

I don't want to go into exactly why I think it's an AI. Suffice to say, I work on LLM related tools like AutoGPT so I have some familiarity with what sort of content they output.

Depending on how the site intends to handle these, there may be advantage to security through obscurity. I will leave it to people with the admin badge to decide whether and how to publicize guidelines for determining content came from AI.

For the record, I disagree with the current guidelines that prohibit AI content. However, to me it is more important to not have divergence between de facto and de jure policy. Therefore, for the purposes of this question, I assume that AI content should not be allowed.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

current policy (1 comment)
current policy
Monica Cellio‭ wrote over 1 year ago

Just to clarify: our baseline network policy bars undisclosed AI content because it's plagiarism, and allows moderators to summarily delete disclosed AI content because it's usually of poor quality. Individual communities are free to say "no we welcome that content", so long as its provenance is clear -- "I asked ChatGPT and got this response..." or similar.