Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Referencing Stack Exchange progress on profiles

Post

Referencing Stack Exchange progress on profiles

+2
−10

I invested tremendous resources into producing quality content, and marketing it. Starting from zero to me is excessive.

I'd like some way to display my SE progress directly and visibly on my Codidact profile. What'd appeal to me:

  1. Display SE stats alongside Codidact's wherever rep + badges are shown. Codidact's on top, SE's on bottom. It doesn't have to stay up-to-date.
  2. Merge SE Q&A history into Codidact's. Have an icon indicate it's from SE, and the URL goes there instead of somewhere on Codidact. The two categories would be ranked (sorted) equally, such that my SE "top posts" are on top (unless Codidact's outrank them).

I'm not a retired altruist. I need the visibility. If my problems with SE overwhelm me, Codidact isn't my fallback, a personal blog is.

This isn't a demand, I'm brief for clarity. I commend the Codidact effort.

Some references: my SE, my top post

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Fake name (1 comment)
Fake name
Olin Lathrop‭ wrote about 1 year ago

If you are really after visibility, then use your real name. Unless your company is called "OverLordGoldDragon Consulting, Inc", then positive contributions associated with that name won't do you any good.