Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on What is the policy for Codidact data use by other, especially for-profit organizations?

Post

What is the policy for Codidact data use by other, especially for-profit organizations?

+5
−0

SE recently made a deal allowing OpenAI to train their LLMs on community generated content (user-created questions and answers). Many active SE users were rather dismayed about this (including myself); some users saw it as a betrayal of trust.

Given that Codidact is a not-for-profit organization, and given that users of Codidact can include their own copyright and license to responses, you might conclude that this could never happen on Codidact.

But is it safe to assume that Codidact does not and will never allow a for-profit organization to crawl community created content and use this as data to be monetized? If it's not totally safe to assume this, is then at least safe to assume that if the Codidact organization board would in some dismal future consider making such a deal, that they would first consult the actual user community and try to reach a broad consensus?

Last question. If the answer to the first and/or second question is "yes", would it then not be more in line with Codidact policies or guidelines, to use the CC By-NC 4.0 license as default (and leave it up to any user to perhaps change this to CC By-SA 4.0)?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

related: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/291474 (7 comments)
related: https://meta.codidact.com/posts/291474
mudskipper‭ wrote 6 months ago

Thanks for the link. I just found that post too. The focus there seems to be more on "how to prevent". But my question is really: What is the general policy here (if there is any)?

trichoplax‭ wrote 6 months ago

The same link with human readable link text: What can be done to block Codidact content from getting used by crawlers/for AI training? (Markdown available from the "Copy Link" button below each post.)

I like this format because it saves people from having to follow the link in order to find out whether they want to follow the link.

samcarter‭ wrote 6 months ago

trichoplax‭ The disadvantage of markdown links is that users can't immediately see where the link will lead them and they have to mouse hover first to see if it is a link within the same community or to an external site. If integrated into a sentence, markdown links can also be hard to notice. Especially if colour settings at night reduce blue colours. A plain url is much easier to spot.

trichoplax‭ wrote 6 months ago

Interesting points.

I wonder if this would be a useful compromise? The following markdown:

[https://meta.codidact.com/posts/291474](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/291474 "What can be done to block Codidact content from getting used by crawlers/for AI training?")

gives what looks like a plain link, but shows the question title on hover:

https://meta.codidact.com/posts/291474

samcarter‭ wrote 6 months ago

trichoplax‭ This would be a great compromise! Maybe you make a feature request?

trichoplax‭ wrote 6 months ago

Tested on mobile and now it doesn't seem such a good compromise. A long press on mobile doesn't show the hover text.