Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Clicking on an avatar to see a user's profile

Parent

Clicking on an avatar to see a user's profile

+4
−0

Below a post the user avatar shows, along with the username and some stats. The username is a link to the user profile page:

Mouse cursor showing as a pointing hand over the username

Note the mouse cursor shows a hand pointing to indicate this is a link.

However, the avatar is not a link:

Mouse cursor showing as an arrow over the avatar

Note the mouse cursor shows an arrow - this is not a link.

Could the avatar also be made a link to the user profile page? This would be consistent with the user's own avatar at the top right of the page, and would make visiting the user profile page easier by giving a larger click target (particularly for users with short usernames).

Another option would be to make the whole grey box a link to the user profile page, for an even bigger click target. Does anyone have a preference between these two approaches?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+4
−0
preference between these two approaches?

There are actually three approaches to consider, your two alternative proposals and leaving it alone.

I don't have any preference between leaving it alone and making the avatar clickable. Having the avatar clickable is probably slightly more intuitive, but this is a really minor nit in the scheme of things where there are far more important things to spend brain cycles on.

However, the whole box should not be one click target. In some future context it might be useful to have the scores also displayed in that box individually clickable. I'm not saying anyone should run out and do that, but it makes sense to leave it as an option.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

I agree low priority (1 comment)
I agree low priority
trichoplax‭ wrote 5 months ago

Good point about keeping options open for the other components in the box.

As for priority, yes I also think this is very low priority. Many of the things I raise are low priority - I raise them as a reminder to do them one day, not to take up time today.

I also have another incentive for raising small easy tasks: Codidact runs on open source software, which anyone is welcome to contribute to. I definitely wouldn't have started contributing if my only option was a task that was both complex and high priority. The existence of low priority tasks that are easy to work on gives new contributers a low pressure way to start.