Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Seeking feedback on experience with open source chat software

Post

Seeking feedback on experience with open source chat software

+4
−0

Currently Codidact uses Discord for chat, which is linked from the right hand panel:

Right hand panel showing a link to "join us in chat"

Codidact runs on open source software, whereas Discord is closed source. The Codidact Foundation is a non-profit organisation, whereas Discord is a for-profit company which advertises paid-for products to its users (including users of the Codidact Discord server).

There are several discussions on Meta related to this:

The following posts about linking to Discord also mention the future possibility of a built-in chat:

It seems that while there is some community desire for an alternative to Discord, there is unlikely to be available development time to build Codidact-specific chat software for some time. I'm interested to hear how the community would feel about using existing open source chat software as a replacement for Discord.

Do any of you have experience of using any open source chat software? What are their good and bad points? Which ones would you be happy to see as Codidact's chat long term?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

To throw in some alternatives which I found more pleasant to use than zulip: - matrix: has the ad... (4 comments)
Best avoid yet another intermediary platform (2 comments)
Best avoid yet another intermediary platform

If Codidact is still set on building chat software (I’d like to cowork on it once I feel productive enough to pick up programming again), I think we should avoid some intermediary software. We currently have a bunch of users on the Discord server(s), but not that many are active. As has been said before, I’m worried we’d lose passive users that would otherwise become active again due to their current tie with the platform and chat.

trichoplax‭ wrote 3 months ago

I understand the desire to avoid making two switches if we can instead just wait and make one switch later. That's part of why I'm seeking feedback - if there's a solution out there that would work permanently rather than Codidact building its own, then we'd only need to switch once. If the existing solutions would only be another temporary fix, then I agree I'd rather stick with what we have until the permanent fix is available.